Member-only story

Nicaragua Before The International Court Of Justice: A Comprehensive Guide

Rudyard Kipling

·7.4k Followers· Follow

Published in Nicaragua Before The International Court Of Justice: Impacts On International Law

4 min read · 1 month before

1.5k View Claps

88 Respond

Save

Listen

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It is based in The Hague, Netherlands, and has jurisdiction over disputes between states that have accepted its jurisdiction.

Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice: Impacts on International Law

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3468 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	462 pages

Nicaragua has been a party to the ICJ since 1948. In 2013, Nicaragua filed a case against Colombia, alleging that Colombia had violated Nicaragua's maritime boundaries and had failed to respect Nicaragua's sovereign rights over its continental shelf.

The ICJ has yet to issue a judgment in the case. However, the proceedings have generated a great deal of interest, as they could have implications for other disputes in the region.

Legal Arguments

Nicaragua's case is based on several legal arguments. First, Nicaragua argues that Colombia has violated the principle of uti possidetis juris. This principle states that states should respect the boundaries that existed between them at the time of their independence.

Second, Nicaragua argues that Colombia has violated the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). UNCLOS is an international treaty that sets out the legal framework for all activities in the oceans and seas.

Third, Nicaragua argues that Colombia has failed to respect Nicaragua's sovereign rights over its continental shelf. The continental shelf is the seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas that extend beyond the territorial sea of a coastal state.

Historical Context

The dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia has a long and complex history. The two countries have been disputing their maritime boundaries since the early 19th century.

In 1928, the two countries signed a treaty that established their maritime boundary. However, the treaty was never ratified by Colombia. In 1960, Nicaragua filed a case against Colombia with the ICJ, alleging that Colombia had violated the treaty.

The ICJ ruled in favor of Nicaragua in 1972. However, the ruling did not resolve the dispute, as Colombia refused to accept the ICJ's jurisdiction.

Potential Outcomes

The ICJ has yet to issue a judgment in the current case. However, there are several possible outcomes.

First, the ICJ could rule in favor of Nicaragua. This would mean that Colombia would be required to respect Nicaragua's maritime boundaries and sovereign rights over its continental shelf.

Second, the ICJ could rule in favor of Colombia. This would mean that Nicaragua would not be entitled to the maritime territory that it is claiming.

Third, the ICJ could issue a compromise judgment. This would mean that the ICJ would divide the disputed territory between the two countries.

The case between Nicaragua and Colombia is a complex and important one. The ICJ's judgment will have implications for other disputes in the region.

This comprehensive guide has provided an in-depth understanding of the case, including the legal arguments, historical context, and potential outcomes.

Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice: Impacts on International Law

5 out of 5